Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
8th May 2007, 12:38 PM #1Pip Madeley Guest
Moore blames women for 'banal' TV
Patrick Moore, the oldest man alive (or so it seems) thinks women have ruined television.
British TV standards are deteriorating because the BBC is "run by women", astronomer Sir Patrick Moore has said.
The Sky at Night host also described female newsreaders as "jokey" and called for separate channels to cater for the needs of the different sexes. "I think it may eventually happen", the 84-year-old told the Radio Times. A BBC spokesman described Sir Patrick as being one of TV's best-loved figures and said his "forthright" views were "what we all love about him".
The presenter said: "The trouble is the BBC now is run by women and it shows soap operas, cooking, quizzes, kitchen-sink plays. You wouldn't have had that in the golden days. I would like to see two independent wavelengths - one controlled by women, and one for us, controlled by men."
He claimed that interesting programmes were screened too late at night, and said he would "rather be dead in a ditch" than appear on Celebrity Big Brother.
And asked about his favourite series, Sir Patrick said he no longer enjoyed certain programmes because of their modern storylines. "I used to watch Doctor Who and Star Trek, but they went PC - making women commanders, that kind of thing. I stopped watching."
Sir Patrick appears in the Guinness Book of Records as the longest-serving TV presenter, having appeared on his show about astronomy since 1957.
"Wot you lookin' at, bitch? Get back in the kitchen and make me an omelette."
-- Patrick Moore, yesterday
-
8th May 2007, 1:08 PM #2
He's only saying what we're all thinking.
...and said he would "rather be dead in a ditch" than appear on Celebrity Big Brother.
-
8th May 2007, 1:13 PM #3
I just read this on yahoo and was immensely disappointed in the man. I mean, it's just nonsense, isn't it? I never had him down as an old fashioned sexist man, but it does seem he is.
It should be noted of course that the majority of the programmes he mentions in that article were created by men - especially the soaps - Coronation Street was by Tony Warren, Brookside and Hollyoaks by Phil Redmond, Eastenders was by script writer Tony Holland and producer Julia Smith, Emmerdale by Kevin Laffin, etc, whilst an awful lot of quiz series formats are by men too.
The fact that he has a problem with Star Trek Voyager (presumably, as that's the only one with a female commander) is bizarre, if he didn't like it for somewhat ropey plots and an insistence on using the Borg a bit too much that'd be fair enough, but imo the all too macho Enterprise was much much worse.
Anyhoo, erm, yeah, I won't go on, but it is very disappointing to hear such words from a man I'd previously thought was worthy of a lot of respect."RIP Henchman No.24."
-
8th May 2007, 1:16 PM #4
I say good on Pat for speaking his mind!
I think he's got a point too!
-
8th May 2007, 1:44 PM #5
He might have a point, but he's still a bitter/bloated old ****.
and said he would "rather be dead in a ditch" than appear on Celebrity Big Brother.
-
8th May 2007, 2:02 PM #6
TV hasn't been the same since Gamesmaster was cancelled. That's what's really upset him.
Pity. I have no understanding of the word. It is not registered in my vocabulary bank. EXTERMINATE!
-
8th May 2007, 2:16 PM #7
I'm surprised that anyone thinks he has a point, I really do think that nearly everything he says is rubbish, he's saying things like "The trouble is the BBC now is run by women and it shows soap operas, cooking, quizzes, kitchen-sink plays" but it's just not true.
For example, here's a list of the beeb's executive board (who are the people who generally decide the direction the channel should go in):
Director-General and Chair, Executive Board Mark Thompson
Deputy Director-General Mark Byford
Director, Audio & Music Jenny Abramsky
Director, Vision Jana Bennett
Director, Marketing, Communications & Audiences Tim Davie
Director, Future Media & Technology Ashley Highfield
Director, People Stephen Kelly
Group Finance Director Zarin Patel
Chief Executive, BBC Worldwide John Smith
Chief Operating Officer Caroline Thomson
Non-executive Directors
Senior Independent Director Marcus Agius
Non-executive Director Dr Mike Lynch OBE
Non-executive Director David Robbie
Non-executive Director Dr Samir Shah OBE
Non-executive Director Robert Webb QC
Just out of interest, for those who think he's got a point, how do you back this up?"RIP Henchman No.24."
-
8th May 2007, 2:48 PM #8
I'll come back to this later Alex but the media lap up this kind of thing. I like Pat for being honest in what he thinks rather than pandering to political correctness. When you get to age 84 I think you should be entitled to speak your mind. Anyway I'll come back to this later
-
8th May 2007, 3:12 PM #9
If you read his autobiog, Alex, you'll realise that a lot of what he says is (a) Straight out of his head and (b) Not very seriously meant anyway.
At his age I think he's just decided he doesn't give a toss about what people think about what he says.Bazinga !
-
8th May 2007, 3:31 PM #10
Oh I can imagine that Jon, I'm just surprised that anyone agrees with him. I just looked at my comment above about how people might "back up the idea" that he's right and it sounds a bit serious, which I didn't mean it to too much, but I just really think he's talking nonsense there and wondered just out of interest why anyone would think it really is the case.
"RIP Henchman No.24."
-
8th May 2007, 7:06 PM #11
Getting back to this:
For a start we don't know how long this interview was, what questions were put to him and what the context was in which the statement's been made. Journalists can vary considerably in quality and one looking for cheap shots will easily get a seemingly controversial statement from an elderly forthright gentleman. I would expect most people of this age do not seek to be populist - I'll bet if you talk to your elderly relatives you'll find they speak their mind and good on them.
I think for example the view that politically correct influence on television such as Star Trek has made it different is a valid one to hold and if that makes it less entertaining to an individual or group for whatever reasons they're entitled to say it. I also agree with his point that there are too many of the types of programme he describes, whether this is can be attributed to women I can't say but certainly the programming he describes tends to be aimed at women.
I believe our society is rife with hypocrisy - those who run the country and in positions of influence and power be it politicians or celebs dish out what we want to hear all of the time. When you get to the older generations they simply cut the bull I reckon and thats refreshing.
I don't think Moore should lose any of the "respect" you mention Alex for giving his views he should be applauded for being honest
What makes a person worthy of "respect" anyway. I think we'll all have different definitions of this.
On the whole I see this as somewhat tongue in cheek. His reported comments made me smile
-
8th May 2007, 7:12 PM #12Captain Tancredi Guest
Perhaps the problem isn't necessarily women making the decisions, but TV executives of both sexes making scheduling decisions based on the assumption that women will be the majority of their audience for most of the day apart from a few hours in the evening (well, somebody's got to make the dinner and wash the dishes) and assuming that most women are more interested in undemanding lifestyle programming rather than anything creative or interesting.
-
8th May 2007, 7:36 PM #13Perhaps the problem isn't necessarily women making the decisions, but TV executives of both sexes making scheduling decisions based on the assumption that women will be the majority of their audience for most of the day apart from a few hours in the evening (well, somebody's got to make the dinner and wash the dishes) and assuming that most women are more interested in undemanding lifestyle programming rather than anything creative or interesting.
-
8th May 2007, 8:14 PM #14Getting back to this:
For a start we don't know how long this interview was, what questions were put to him and what the context was in which the statement's been made. Journalists can vary considerably in quality and one looking for cheap shots will easily get a seemingly controversial statement from an elderly forthright gentleman. I would expect most people of this age do not seek to be populist - I'll bet if you talk to your elderly relatives you'll find they speak their mind and good on them.
I think for example the view that politically correct influence on television such as Star Trek has made it different is a valid one to hold and if that makes it less entertaining to an individual or group for whatever reasons they're entitled to say it. I also agree with his point that there are too many of the types of programme he describes, whether this is can be attributed to women I can't say but certainly the programming he describes tends to be aimed at women.
I believe our society is rife with hypocrisy - those who run the country and in positions of influence and power be it politicians or celebs dish out what we want to hear all of the time. When you get to the older generations they simply cut the bull I reckon and thats refreshing.
I don't think Moore should lose any of the "respect" you mention Alex for giving his views he should be applauded for being honest
What makes a person worthy of "respect" anyway. I think we'll all have different definitions of this.
On the whole I see this as somewhat tongue in cheek. His reported comments made me smile
Btw, I'm enjoying this thread, I do like a good debate from time to time!"RIP Henchman No.24."
-
8th May 2007, 8:23 PM #15
He'd soon change his tune with me sat on his knee in a Star Trek costume.
...then again, it might back up his argument!
-
8th May 2007, 8:32 PM #16
Yeah that would be going too far sure but I think being a bit sexist in our comments now and again is like someone calling me a jock down in England, it's a bit of leg pulling and light banter to stir things up. I particularly enjoyed Pip's quote giving the ultimate sterotypical statement .
But then again Pat has always been an eccentric as well and he's certainly been affectionately (I think) poked fun at by impressionists over the years. From what I've seen he's always been willing to laugh at himself. Magnus Pyke whose long gone was of a similar ilk, if anyone remembers him.
I agree it's good to have some healthy debate - I have a tendency now and again to be in the mood to play devil's advocate for reaction.
-
8th May 2007, 8:37 PM #17
-
8th May 2007, 8:58 PM #18
-
8th May 2007, 9:02 PM #19I would like to see two independent wavelengths - one controlled by women, and one for us, controlled by men."
I'm guessing the 'Lifetime' network and 'Spike TV' aren't available over there then?
(though I might point out that neither is, as far as I know, controlled by one sex, but rather are aimed at different genders)
-
8th May 2007, 10:38 PM #20Pip Madeley Guest
-
8th May 2007, 11:07 PM #21Wayne Guest
To put it leniently, i think he's putting 2+2 together & making 5.
Yes, there's some appalling crap on tv today, but his reasons don't really stand up to anything like scrutiny. TV is a reflection of our society, & if you wanted to look at all the factors invlolved in today's society/today's tv, you'd probably have to do a 5year PHD to cover it all. It's too easy to just blame so called political correctness. It's a lazy argument, & i apologize in advance because it leads me to a Star Trek rant.
Those not interested in Star Trek, skip to the *
The Star Trek thing is subjective. Using the argument that the modern Star Trek shows became too 'PC' just doesn't wash with me. The fact that they had a black captain or a female captain is totally immaterial to the quality of the shows concerned. It's just down to personal taste. I can totally see why a lot of younger folk can't relate to the original Star Trek, but i grew up with so i love it. The sequel shows are a different animal altogether. To be honest even as an avid TOS fan, i have to admit that some the best eps of the sequels have far more depth to them that TOS. The writing, the stories, the characterizations, are much richer & more 3 dimensional than Kirk going around snogging women etc...
But equally, the best of TOS eps were groundbreaking for their time. There was some excellent & really thought provoking stories that were much broader than it's revisionist reputation suggests. As well as having some great Sci-Fi stories, it tackled issues & political themes via allegory as much as it could in those days & still stay on tv, & i think it's a shame that many people turn their nose up at it because of it's old fashioned style.
Equally, i know fans of the old series that are just as bad in reverse, & use lame arguments like the alledged PC factor, in an attempt to give their personal tastes some sort justification. It's as much of a shame that they also for their part, can't see past the different style & more modern trappings, because they're missing out on some truly great stories, not all of it by any means, but there's a lot superb stuff in there, Not just in terms of Sci-Fi, but in a much broader sense. The simple truth is that there's good & bad in both old & new Trek. Much like there is in both old & new Who, & pretty much anything else. You can't generalise & be accurate.
It's worth remembering that people like Gene Roddenberry & Gene Coon, & others who worked on TOS in the 60's, were fighting the network all the way on things which are consdered PC. Roddenberry fought to get a black woman, not just in the show, but as part of the regular cast in command crew on the bridge, because he thought it was important. Ok, any Trek fan will own up to the fact that the Uhura's character was never fleshed out very much, & looking at it from today's perspective, the character can rather cynically IMO, be seen as the token black, who was little more than the Enterprise's telephone receptionist. It's easy to take that attitude 40 odd years later, now that it's a perfectly ordinary thing, but in 60's America things were very different.
Star Trek presented a mult-racial crew with black/asian/russian etc crewmember, & the character of Spock was also conceived partially as a vehicle for tackling present day bigotry, in a future where the folk of Earth have learned to overcome such superficial differences.
So if anyone wants to talk about modern Star Trek being too PC, then i'd argue it always has been. Having a black captain & more relevant to this thread a woman captain, are only extensions on the the kind of show that Star Trek always was, & always intended to be, right from the start.
So IMO, Patrick Moore is talking bollocks.
*rant over.
Btw... I fully accept that dressing the female cast up in mini-skirts isn't really consisent with the Star Trek has always aimed to be PC argument. But then, it was the 60's, & luckily even Gene Roddenberry wasn't perfect.
Anyway back to Patrick Moore:
Leaving aside whether or not it's sexist, to blame women is just silly. It's illogical Captain. He may be a very intelligent bloke, who's an expert in his field, (& he's a great jazz vibes player too!) but it strikes me than he's speaking out of ignorance more than anything. But he's 84. He comes from a totally different generation, & he's more than likely too old to change now.
What dissapoints me more than anything is the generalization. I know a lot of women who have no interest whatsoever in so called 'women's tv', anyway!
Anyway..... I've run out of steam, after getting sidetracked into a Star Trek rant.
Basically, Patrick Moore is a perhaps silly (but ultimately harmless) old sod for his comments, but i'm sure he's not malicious.Last edited by Wayne; 8th May 2007 at 11:14 PM.
-
9th May 2007, 12:13 AM #22Pip Madeley Guest
"Dude, you gotta introduce me to that black chick."
-
9th May 2007, 12:16 AM #23Wayne Guest
Classic.
-
9th May 2007, 12:59 AM #24
I think Wayne's just anti-Moore full stop.
Interesting argument on the Trek - just as well I'm one of those people who appreciates the later stuff too
Nice one Pip
Similar Threads
-
Rise Of The Women?
By Rob McCow in forum Adventures In Time and SpaceReplies: 7Last Post: 3rd Apr 2013, 1:46 PM -
Sir Patrick Moore RIP :(
By Jason Thompson in forum News and SportReplies: 10Last Post: 11th Dec 2012, 4:17 PM -
Insurance Wars - Women v Men
By Rob McCow in forum News and SportReplies: 4Last Post: 5th Jul 2011, 8:37 PM -
Influential Women In Doctor Who
By Rob McCow in forum Adventures In Time and SpaceReplies: 21Last Post: 9th Mar 2011, 12:02 PM -
Dictionary For Women
By Trudi G in forum General ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 28th Jul 2007, 9:09 PM
PSAudios 6.1. Bless You Doctor Who
[/URL] (Click for large version) Doctor Who A thrilling two-part adventure starring Brendan Jones & Paul Monk & Paul Monk Bless You,...
23rd Nov 2020, 3:02 PM