Results 26 to 50 of 53
-
4th Apr 2009, 12:35 PM #26
Yes, but it obviously didn't work.
-
4th Apr 2009, 1:45 PM #27
For all we know, it did obliterate the Master's timeline (although since it was already obliterated, would it be 'available'?). It's not as if there's anything in TSE/JEnd to suggest either way - the Doctor doesn't say, "Hello Martha, haven't seen you since that business with the Master" does he. So maybe that now never happened at all, not just happened but then never happened.
Right, I trust that's that cleared up!
-
4th Apr 2009, 2:24 PM #28
I honestly don't even remember what the reality bomb is, but didn't somebody say before that it didn't get used anyway? Surely if it DID get used then it would have much bigger consequences for the show, such as killing Rose and her entire family seeing as she lives in a parallel universe now.
And in any case, if the Master's alternate timeline was obliterated, then what symptoms are you expecting to see? Seeing as it was already obliterated anyway at the end of the story that it was in. Are you expecting your DVD of the story to vanish or something?
-
4th Apr 2009, 4:55 PM #29
It didn't get used in the story, no, meaning that the question is academic. The various other universes, timelines etc are still supposed to be in existence by the time Journey's End finishes. Doesn't matter what it was supposed to do, as it never got the chance. The Wirrn were supposed to wipe out the crew of the Ark, but they didn't.
-
7th Apr 2009, 2:43 PM #30
As no-one picked up on my earlier point, just when was 'Midnight' set? I'm assuming in our future? Yet, the lost moon of Poosh is still lost, and has never been found, even though the Doctor returns it at the end of Journey's End.....
“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild
-
7th Apr 2009, 3:00 PM #31
Midnight is set in the early 27th century.
The Time Traveller's Almanac says so.For every fail, there is an equal and opposite win.
...Oh, who am I kidding?
-
7th Apr 2009, 5:37 PM #32
Must be true then.
-
7th Apr 2009, 5:53 PM #33
-
8th Apr 2009, 10:16 AM #34
Erm, no, not really.
“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild
-
8th Apr 2009, 9:50 PM #35
It's an official BBC publication, so short of a date being firmly established in the episode itself, it's pretty much a definitive date. Like in The Making of Doctor Who, they state that The War Games is set in the year 309906, and now most people accept that.
Look at it like this, if RTD specifically stated that the Shan Shen sequences of Turn Left were intended to be set in the 85th century, wouldn't it be nice and simple for everyone concerned to just go along with that, especially if it fits in with other established continuity?For every fail, there is an equal and opposite win.
...Oh, who am I kidding?
-
9th Apr 2009, 7:22 AM #36they state that The War Games is set in the year 309906, and now most people accept that.
Mind you, I take the Target definition of SIDRAT as Space & Inter-Dimensional Robot All-purpose Transporter as being gospel, so what do I know?
Bloody Mac Hulke!Last edited by Andrew Curnow; 9th Apr 2009 at 8:00 AM.
-
9th Apr 2009, 7:53 AM #37
The date for The War Games is based on a reference to the Doctor's trial in that earlier story which Engin gives in The Deadly Assassin. It could possibly be a serial number of some sort, although even if it is a date it's more likely to be a Time Lord one than an Earth one, and might only be referring to the date of the Gallifrey scenes in that story rather than the rest of it. It might not simply be a year either, it could be something like 30.99.06, for example. The reason it's been used in reference books is because it's the nearest thing there is to a possible date that's been given for the story. The stuff that turns up in these reference books is sometimes just based on fan theories or interpretations of something, and can still be open to question, whether or not the book might be making the BBC any money.
Last edited by Logo Polish; 9th Apr 2009 at 9:58 AM.
-
9th Apr 2009, 10:03 AM #38
I was watching The Stolen Earth last night on BBC3 and while I was watching it a silly question came to me, is the Torchwood Rift centred on Cardiff so where ever Cardiff goes it goes or is it at the same location as Cardiff and doesn't move. What I mean is in The Stolen Earth they use the Rift energy to call the Doctor but the Rift will be back where the Earth used to be not in the Madusa Cascade. So how can Torchwood use the Rift?
-
9th Apr 2009, 1:37 PM #39Pip Madeley Guest
That's a very good question - I wonder what RTD would say?
-
9th Apr 2009, 1:37 PM #40
I think the rift is "ingrained" in the section of space-time that Cardiff occupies, so much so that it can be used to "pull" the earth without it coming off.
It also may or may not have something to do with the 8th Doctor novel Interference, which claims that after the Time Lords defeated the Vampires, they sealed off all known entry points into E-Space with giant "stoppers" the size of planets. It went on to say that if these stoppers are ever compromised, then the pent-up energy of millions of years of suppressed time will be unleashed.
Which is pretty worrying for Earth, when one considers Inferno.
But back to my point, perhaps the rift was once part of a Time Lord navigational system for moving the "stoppers" around. It would explain why the Doctor instantly knows how to get the Earth back home. Maybe the Daleks knew about this and that was why they invaded Earth in 2157, to harness the power of the Rift, and use it for their own time travel experiments. Maybe they did just that, and then sent a kill-squad to get rid of the Doctor in revenge for defeating them. You never know. Maybe the Fendahl discovered the purpose of the Rift, so the Time Lords erased its planet to preserve their secret.
Sorry, I'm just rambling now.Last edited by shada pavlova; 9th Apr 2009 at 8:07 PM.
For every fail, there is an equal and opposite win.
...Oh, who am I kidding?
-
9th Apr 2009, 5:43 PM #41
I don't know the answer, but I'm sure it has something to do with Yartek, leader of the alien Voord.
Si.
-
9th Apr 2009, 7:38 PM #42
His eyes are definitely too close together.
-
9th Apr 2009, 10:24 PM #43
SEEK SEEK SEEK WITH THE BONES!
-
10th Apr 2009, 8:50 PM #44
Come again?
For every fail, there is an equal and opposite win.
...Oh, who am I kidding?
-
10th Apr 2009, 9:57 PM #45
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. My opinion has always been that if it's not stated on screen, then it isn't true. Or isn't necessarily true at any rate. And that books and audios don't count at all and even this leads to countless inconsistencies and contradictions as it is.
But these are both just opinions, and neither of us is "right".
-
10th Apr 2009, 9:58 PM #46
To me Sholakh, TO MEEEE!!!!
Pity. I have no understanding of the word. It is not registered in my vocabulary bank. EXTERMINATE!
-
10th Apr 2009, 10:32 PM #47
-
11th Apr 2009, 7:55 PM #48
But how can it be, given you used the phrase "short of a date being firmly established in the episode itself".
Si.
-
11th Apr 2009, 9:36 PM #49
...Because I haven't actually SEEN The Deadly Assassin.
For every fail, there is an equal and opposite win.
...Oh, who am I kidding?
-
11th Apr 2009, 10:17 PM #50
How do you know it's stated on screen then?
Si.
Similar Threads
-
Face of Evil - Very Powerful & Very Stupid
By Larry in forum DVD and Blu-rayReplies: 69Last Post: 12th Mar 2012, 8:35 AM -
Stupid Halloween questions ...
By WhiteCrowNZ in forum General ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 27th Oct 2010, 9:13 PM -
Stupid Govt. Allows Advertising to NHS Patients
By Rob McCow in forum General ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 20th Mar 2008, 8:15 PM -
The Completely Useless Encylopedia II
By Simon R in forum The Fiction FactoryReplies: 1Last Post: 1st Sep 2007, 1:54 AM -
The General Public Are Stupid
By Si Hunt in forum General ForumReplies: 25Last Post: 11th Mar 2007, 11:00 PM
PSAudios 6.1. Bless You Doctor Who
[/URL] (Click for large version) Doctor Who A thrilling two-part adventure starring Brendan Jones & Paul Monk & Paul Monk Bless You,...
23rd Nov 2020, 3:02 PM