View Poll Results: What do you think of Let's Kill Hitler?

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • 10/10 - Let's Kill Hitler!

    2 6.06%
  • 9/10 - Let's Mangle Mussolini!

    4 12.12%
  • 8/10 - Let's Gouge Goering

    8 24.24%
  • 7/10 - Let's Stun Stalin

    6 18.18%
  • 6/10 - Let's Maul Mao

    2 6.06%
  • 5/10 - Let's Punch Putin

    2 6.06%
  • 4/10 - Let's Slap Thatcher

    1 3.03%
  • 3/10 - Let's Kick Clegg

    3 9.09%
  • 2/10 - Let's Tap Cameron Lightly On The Shoulder

    2 6.06%
  • 1/10 - Let's Kill Moffat!

    3 9.09%
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 189
  1. #101
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sittingbourne, Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,403

    Default

    It would be nice to have Amy staying on but give her a chance to be a 'normal' companion, i.e. one who has adventures with the Doctor, not one whose life defines the Doctor's adventures.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Airstrip One
    Posts
    4,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by egdcltd View Post
    Here's a thought I just had: Who is in the spacesuit that shoots the Doctor? All the signs up until now seemed to show that it would be the young Melody Pond. That now seems kind of unlikely, as she would have done that in before she poisoned him. Surely she would have remembered she'd already killed him.
    As I speculated earlier in the season on related threads, perhaps 1100 year old Doctor/Ganger sets up a plan with River Song to turn up at the lake in the suit and kill him, thus appearing 'dead' to all the Universe (as shown by the records of the Tesaselecta), and River is imprisoned in Storm Cage for killing a 'good man'.
    “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    Posts
    1,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Vale View Post
    As I speculated earlier in the season on related threads, perhaps 1100 year old Doctor/Ganger sets up a plan with River Song to turn up at the lake in the suit and kill him, thus appearing 'dead' to all the Universe (as shown by the records of the Tesaselecta), and River is imprisoned in Storm Cage for killing a 'good man'.
    And this seems even more plausible now.

    Incidentally, writing a drama about a small number of people and their relationships with one another is - basically - just what Steven Moffat does. (vis Coupling, Chalk, Joking Apart, Press Gang, even Jekyll.)

    Whether we like it or not, I'm afraid that's just what Doctor Who is going to be while Moffat's in charge.

    I didn't like it myself last year, but now I've accepted it and have become used to it I find I'm really rather enjoying it!

    But don't worry, Moffat won't last forever and then Doctor Who will be something else again.

    (My money's on Gatiss...)

  4. #104

    Default

    (I hope not)

  5. #105

    Default

    Another vote for "NOT GATISS!" as producer. I'm sure this Saturday's episode will make a good case, but that's not enough! I'd rather see someone who never wrote a NA or has previous knowledge of the show like RTD and Moffatt has.
    "Are you nuts?!?" No, but it'd give a fresh outlook on the show. Plus just because someone didn't have involvement with the show, it doesn't make them stupid.
    Maybe this should go in a thread of it's own?..

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    (My money's on Gatiss...)
    Ohhh that's just sick.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    Imagine if he cast himself as the Doctor.

    Si.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    *shudders*

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,320

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    You said that knowing she had the ability to regenerate added more weight to her sacrifice. Why? She, the River we know, still 'dies', whether she can regenerate or not.
    Whenever a character has something akin to immortality it just adds weight imho.



    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    Apart from giving her the ability to heal the Doctor?
    Which, again, I said was something that felt super rushed and just thrown in there so we could get to point B where River becomes part of the goodies.



    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    I have neither told you not to watch nor mocked your reasons for it, though frankly it does baffle me why anyone would watch something they were not enjoying, apparently just to tear it to shreds. Asking why is a perfectly legitimate question, however.
    I wasn't directing that bit at you. And there is such a thing called shaddenfreude (which isn't exactly what I'm talking about, but it is sort of akin to why people love trainwrecks so much)

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,320

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zbigniev Hamson View Post
    (I hope not)
    Ditto from me. At that point I'd probably definitely stop watching.

    I agree with the person who suggested having on someone who hasn't been involved with Who, maybe from a different genre.

    See, maybe what I'm not liking from Moffat is how flippant everything is in that it's all very much like a sitcom and there are no real dramatic or serious stakes or consequences involved.

    Whereas RTD had more drama, more grit (I never watched Queer as Folk, but I'm sure that's why his era was the way it was)

    Not to seem biased or anything, but it'd be great to see perhaps the likes of a(n) Ira Stephen Behr, Ron Moore, Bryan Fuller, or Tim Minear. I know they're all American, for starters, but, hey, it'd definitely be a new outlook/vision and all have been involved with great series in and out of the sci-fi/fantasy genre.

    Actually, I'm quite surprised there haven't been any American writers asked on to do episodes (or have there been?) I mean, there's a big viewership pool here in the States and BBC America and BBC are quite closely tied nowadays...
    Last edited by FlyingBeastie; 31st Aug 2011 at 4:51 AM.

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    Posts
    1,318

    Default

    Incidentally, I feel I ought to point out that when I wrote "(My money's on Gatiss...)" this was not due to any particular desire on my part (although having come to this conclusion, and subsequently weighed up the pros and cons, I think I've warmed to the idea slightly), but simply because I looked at the options and Gatiss seems by far the more likely choice.

    The other two in contention would appear to be Chris Chibnall and Toby Whithouse, both having plenty of experience of running their own shows. But Whithouse's is on a minority channel whereas Gatiss has created shows for the bigger channels, and Chibnall just doesn't bear thinking about... (and is hopefully too busy elsewhere anyway).

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    Matthew Graham may be a contender too.

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    Posts
    1,318

    Default

    I guess so. But Graham seems primarily to be employed by Kudos; I wonder if he's tied in somehow, or if that's just because he enjoys the people he works with there? I don't think I like the idea of Matthew Graham taking over either!

  14. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    No, none of the candidates so far are entirely ideal. Maybe they need someone from outside, someone who isn't a fan to do it. That'd be a good shake up.

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    I think it's important to remember that a body does officially "die" before it regenerates; that much is made clear in "The TV Movie" most of all.

    So regeneration renews a body and brings it back to life. It seems now a limited amount of regeneration "energy" can heal a body without completely re-arranging the cells and altering the appearance. "Let's Kill Hitler" seemed to show for the first time that someone elses regeneration energy can bring another body back to life, without changing the appearance.

    So really, maybe this was the clue. All it takes is for someone to wade in to the Doctors charred body from "The Impossible Astronaut", dole out a bit of regeneration energy, and rejuvinate it.

    Si.

  16. #116
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    It may not have been the first time, as I think all the silliness in Journey's End with the Meta-Doctor established that regeneration energy does strange odd things to bodies.

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    But this is the first time we've actually seen someone brought back from the dead by a regeneration without having to change their form.

    Maybe there's more to this than we can fry - perhaps someone has engineered more intelligent regeneration 'nanos' that can heal a dead body without it having to change form? Maybe they did it by combining a semi-Time Lord (River) with DNA from an immortal being (Jack) and maybe the nano virus from "An Empty Child" survived and spread it over the rest of mankind? Maybe that's how "Miracle Day" came about? And... and... and...

    KERBOOOM! (Si's head explodes)

    Si.

  18. #118
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newtown, Australia
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingBeastie View Post
    I wasn't directing that bit at you. And there is such a thing called shaddenfreude (which isn't exactly what I'm talking about, but it is sort of akin to why people love trainwrecks so much)
    Schadenfreude is happiness at the misfortune or others. The urge to stop and watch train wrecks is a form of voyuerism.

    Unless you're saying people who stop to watch train wrecks get off on it, in which case, remind me never to sit next to you on a train.

    Oooh, coconut macaroons!

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    But this is the first time we've actually seen someone brought back from the dead by a regeneration without having to change their form.
    Well David Tennant didn't change form, he just redirected the energy.

  20. #120
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    Posts
    1,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Si Hunt View Post
    All it takes is for someone to wade in to the Doctors charred body from "The Impossible Astronaut", dole out a bit of regeneration energy, and rejuvinate it.

    Si.
    What an interesting idea ...

    Suppose the Ganger Doctor has survived and turns up to dole out his remaining regenerations, and the 'original' Doctor then wakes up, having absorbed the Ganger Doctor's future lives as well as River Song's...

    That's anything from twelve to twenty-odd more lives the Doctor has gained before we need to start worrying about "final regeneration angst" rearing its ugly head all over again.

    Of course, the truth is more likely to be that the 900-year-old Doctor can give his remaining two regenerations (augmented by River's, of course) to the 1,100-year-old Doctor, and Bob's yer uncle. 1,100-year-old Doctor lives on, and still has another twelve lives to go before he needs to worry again... (And 900-year-old Doctor can happily go off and waste a couple of hundred years safe in the knowledge that his future is secure.)

  21. #121
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dagenham, Essex.
    Posts
    21

    Default

    I gave it 10/10. Good opener. At least they killed The Doctor this time and not Rory, although I'm sure that is still likely to happen before the end of the season.

  22. #122
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    The only problem with that theory is, I think if the number of the Doctors remaining regenerations would have been mentioned by now if this was to play any kind of part. Indeed, a flippant line suggesting there is virtually no limit was said by the Doctor in "Sarah Jane", and you'd think if this contradicted an important impending plot point, Moffat would have asked for it to be removed.

    I've always said that it would be the work of one line of dialogue to "undo" the apparent "end of the show" as forcast by "The Deadly Assassin" after two more actors, but in hindsight it's actually odd the "limit" hasn't been ressurected by now, rather than brushed under the carpet or contradicted. It would certainly add some dramatic tension to a show whose lead character has until now been almost immortal.

    Si.

  23. #123
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    17,652

    Default

    I gave it 10/10.
    Yay!

  24. #124
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    I gave it 1/10 to balance out the blatant over-enthusiasm for a humdrum episode.

    Si.

  25. #125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Si Hunt View Post
    I gave it 1/10 to balance out the blatant over-enthusiasm for a humdrum episode.

    Si.
    I gave it 10/10 to balance out the mystifying enthusiasm for the previous 48 years of tedious Doctor Who stories.

Similar Threads

  1. Is "Let's Kill Hitler" in bad taste?
    By Si Hunt in forum The New Series
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 29th Aug 2011, 9:57 AM
  2. Hitler on screen
    By Rob McCow in forum The New Series
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 25th Aug 2011, 11:44 AM
  3. "Let's Kill Hitler!" Speculation thread
    By Dino in forum The New Series
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 8th Jun 2011, 10:27 AM
  4. Music to kill your parents by
    By Ralph in forum Music
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12th Jun 2008, 7:13 PM
  5. Rate And Discuss 3.7: 42
    By Pip Madeley in forum The New Series
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 9th Jun 2007, 3:01 PM