Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Valhalla.
    Posts
    15,910

    Default

    All this moaning about having a helmet because of costs & yet it is compulsory to wear a helmet when you buy & ride a motorbike & no one complains that there is an added cost with the safety clothing.
    It's the law & you just make allowances for it when you purchase the bike. Why would it be different for cycles?

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    Absolutely Tim.

    I've just got my handcuffs and my truncheon and that's enough.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirk Gently View Post
    All this moaning about having a helmet because of costs & yet it is compulsory to wear a helmet when you buy & ride a motorbike & no one complains that there is an added cost with the safety clothing.
    It's the law & you just make allowances for it when you purchase the bike. Why would it be different for cycles?
    Yes, I thought that.

    I don't know that there is any evidence that cost is what puts people off anyway, so it could be a spurious argument.
    Why build an engine when you have a perfectly good whale?

  4. #29

    Default

    I don't think so. The safety benefits of wearing a helmet vs not wearing one are already self evident and if people are choosing not to wear helmets and would prefer to risk smashing their brains out then that's their choice. Making it compulsory also won't force most of these people into wearing them, it'll just turn them into criminals.

Similar Threads

  1. The Regeneration Cycle
    By SiHart in forum The New Series
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 4th Aug 2013, 6:51 PM
  2. Long Term Jobless Face Compulsory Manual Labour
    By SiHart in forum News and Sport
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 21st Nov 2010, 10:09 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 31st Mar 2008, 4:55 PM