Thread: Prince Harry: The Royal Arse
Results 1 to 22 of 22
-
23rd Aug 2012, 11:19 AM #1
Prince Harry: The Royal Arse
So none of us could resist sneaking a look at websites where Prince Harry was pictured "in the nud" during a pretty interesting looking private party at Vegas, for research purposes only, of course.
Dissapointingly, the Royal Bollocks arn't on display, but there is one picture of him "cupping" and another of his fatless cheeks while in a naked hug with an unidentified female. It's just all work, work, work for those tireless Royals.
But is this acceptable behaviour for the 3rd in line to the throne? Is this a little undignified? Or should we let the lad have his fun? It's 1980 Auntie Vanessa!
Si.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 11:20 AM #2
Everyone seems to have forgotten the old adage... what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!
I've just got my handcuffs and my truncheon and that's enough.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 1:37 PM #3
28 year old man gets naked in private hotel room with girls shocker!
-
23rd Aug 2012, 1:43 PM #4
It's quite literally never happened before.
Si.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 2:57 PM #5
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Loughton
- Posts
- 11,583
It happened to me last week! I'm not royalty though, so the tabloids ain't interested.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 3:09 PM #6
You're not 28 either!
-
23rd Aug 2012, 3:10 PM #7
He has a very nice arse!
And it's not without precedent - there are nuddy pics of Charles, Andrew and William out there too.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 3:20 PM #8
Yes but we don't care about them cos they're gross gross gross gross.
Si.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 3:45 PM #9
Well William's not too bad but he's married now.
-
23rd Aug 2012, 3:52 PM #10
I think both the princes got their looks from their Dads.
Si.
-
24th Aug 2012, 2:31 PM #11
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Loughton
- Posts
- 11,583
-
24th Aug 2012, 3:38 PM #12
The Sun's hilarious justification for printing the pictures this morning:
The photos have potential implications for the Prince's image representing Britain around the world. There are questions over his security during the Las Vegas holiday. Questions as to whether his position in the Army might be affected. Further, we believe Harry has compromised his own privacy.
Si.
-
24th Aug 2012, 8:35 PM #13
-
24th Aug 2012, 10:12 PM #14
The Sun's 'justification' is a load of hose poo, and they know it. They are just conniving gits who want to sell papers. All that bollocks about public interest and so on is just so much manure. At best, the story raises the issues they mention. The pictures do not, and there is no justification whatsoever for publishing them except to publicly further embarrass Prince Harry.
Worse still is their claim that it is somehow 'perverse' that they are not allowed to publish something that is already widely available online for free. Hardcore pornography is freely available online. Should the Sun complain that they are not permitted to publish it just because we can get it elsewhere anyway?
Bottom line: they are pond scum who care not a jot for respect and privacy of anyone, nor the rules and regulations they work under, just so long as they can sell papers and make a profit.
And just to illustrate their 'lowest common denominator' status, they even came up with a crappy 'pun' headline that doesn't even work. 'Heir it is'?! Please! Do you think their linewriter even knows that it's pronounced like 'air'?
-
24th Aug 2012, 10:13 PM #15
Don't hold back, Jason - go on, say what you really think.
Why build an engine when you have a perfectly good whale?
-
24th Aug 2012, 10:17 PM #16
I just hate the way they use 'public interest' as an excuse. Sorry, what is the 'public interest' issue raised by naked celebrity pictures? What is the 'public interest' raised by celebrity sex lives? What is the 'public interest' in showing pictures of dead people? Or the bath where Whitney Houston died? Or, as a rather more serious example, of publishing names and pictures of people accused of crimes before any conviction is obtained?
Why don't they just admit it's just the same cheap, voyeuristic tendency that makes shows like Big Brother so popular? Why waste their time and energy trying to make themselves out to be doing some public service? No-one buys that crap and they know it.
-
25th Aug 2012, 12:49 AM #17
Watchers in the Fourth Dimension: A Doctor Who Podcast
Three Americans and a Brit attempt to watch their way through the entirety of Doctor Who
----
Latest Episode: The WOTAN Clan, discussing The War Machines
Available on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, and Podbean
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @watchers4d
-
25th Aug 2012, 10:30 AM #18
I'm no fan of the royals, but why is this even considered "news"?
Completely agree.
But sadly, a large cross-section of the general public appears to be interested in this sort of shallow tittle-tattle. Tabloid sales figures offer incontrovertible proof of this, unfortunately.
But much as i detest Murdoch and The Scum, I'm not a big fan of the public in many respects. Many of them don't seem to be fit to vote on anything more important than Big Brother or X Factor.
-
25th Aug 2012, 10:31 AM #19
Here here Jason!
I tell you why they published those pictures. Because people started saying that the Leveson Enquiry was restricting what the press could publish, and they are so arrogant they couldn't bare (no pun intended) to be seen to be being told what to do. That suddenly override the moral high ground of being seen to respect the Royals privacy.
Sun arrogance. They have learned nothing.
Si.
-
25th Aug 2012, 1:11 PM #20
I hope the Sun goes the way of The News of the World.
-
26th Aug 2012, 2:34 PM #21
One thing that has been lost in the furore is that the day before The Sun published these pictures of Harry, they also published pictures of Tony Nicklinson's body being removed from his house by undertakers with his wife in the background. I think that's worse, and I'm surprised there hasn't been an outcry.
Why build an engine when you have a perfectly good whale?
-
26th Aug 2012, 5:26 PM #22
Of course it's worse. In fact the Prince Harry stuff is really nothing more than the usual "celebrity bonk-fest" story that we see all the time. If you don't want your cock all over the internet then don't invite 15 complete strangers with camera phones up to your hotel room and have sex with them. I'm pretty sure that if all the papers had just published the photos straight away, like all the international ones did, then no-one would have thought anything "bad" had been done. It's only because there was this strange, self-imposed couple of days grace that the story has taken on this extra "evil journos" dimension.
If this were Angus Deayton or someone like that, and the photos had been published the next day, who amongst us would have been tutting and blaming the gutter press? Invading someone's privacy is one thing, but if someone very much in the public eye basically throws his clothes and his privacy out of the window to have some drunken fun that's very much something else, and NOT reporting it just because he's our royalty is almost worse.
Similar Threads
-
Royal Baby Boy!
By Rob McCow in forum News and SportReplies: 18Last Post: 25th Jul 2013, 3:11 PM -
Prince of Wales voice of the Daleks!
By SiHart in forum The New SeriesReplies: 12Last Post: 4th Jul 2013, 2:55 PM -
Royal baby
By MinaHarker in forum News and SportReplies: 17Last Post: 10th Dec 2012, 3:11 PM -
People worship Prince Phillip as a God???
By WhiteCrow in forum General ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 12th Jun 2007, 3:16 PM
PSAudios 6.1. Bless You Doctor Who
[/URL] (Click for large version) Doctor Who A thrilling two-part adventure starring Brendan Jones & Paul Monk & Paul Monk Bless You,...
23rd Nov 2020, 3:02 PM