View Poll Results: Rate and Discuss: The Angels Take Manhattan

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • 10: Upper West Side

    3 10.00%
  • 9: Upper East Side

    8 26.67%
  • 8: Central Park

    6 20.00%
  • 7: Midtown West

    6 20.00%
  • 6: Midtown East

    0 0%
  • 5: Chelsea

    3 10.00%
  • 4: Flatiron District Union Square

    2 6.67%
  • 3: East Village

    0 0%
  • 2: Lower East Side

    1 3.33%
  • 1: Lower Manhattan Financial District

    1 3.33%
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 119
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Airstrip One
    Posts
    4,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Saville View Post
    Some great ideas badly executed.
    Just watched it again, and that sums it up for me too. A very badly explained plot, and conclusion.

    Questions....

    Couldn't Rory and/or Amy have escaped with River's Vortex Manipulator?

    How does River find Amy to get the book published?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    It's not, though, is it?
    I meant as a plot device.
    “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild

  2. #52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Saville View Post
    Statue of Liberty? Utter shoite. Even taking away the notion that a 200 ft construct made of stone could walk, unnoticed, along the streets of the city that doesn't sleep, angels are aliens. real aliens. They're NOT any (or worse ALL) old statues imbued with life. It was unnecessary and lazy writing.
    And it's not even made of stone anyway.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    Mike makes a good point. The Angels are alien life forms that turn to stone when looked at. So what actually was the Liberty Angel? A Weeping Angel that fancied a bit of dressing up?

    Si.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,196

    Default

    I'm sure there was a line quite early in the episode (I can't remember who said it) which highlighted that "The Angels have taken over ever statue in the city." That would be why the Statue of Liberty was an Angel.

    Also, am I wrong in my thinking that Angels can move quickly in the blink of an eye. So would the Statue of Liberty really be stomping around the city?
    I’m being extremely clever up here and there’s no one to stand around looking impressed! What’s the point in having you all?

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    But what does that actually mean, "taken over"? Presumably these creatures, whose physical constraints seem to change on a whim, haven't now aquired the ability to "possess" ordinary stone? So maybe it means substitution? Maybe one day will find a whole load of old statues (including Lib!) dumped into the Atlantic? But just why was the SoL Angel so big? What, again, exactly was it?

    Si.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Curnow View Post
    This doesn't really answer the questions, as I'm sure there was some 'timey-wimey' explanation offered during that last graveyard scene as to why he couldn't, but... at least within the internal logic of this episode, surely the answer is he can't now go along and see them because he's read Amy's Afterword, which is clearly written by an Amy who never saw him again after that day. So it's fixed.

    Just a thought.
    I agree.

    Also, didn't the Doctor ay something about NYC being unable to take another paradox without exploding? And haven't we heard somewhere before about the Doctor himself being a massive paradox?
    Why build an engine when you have a perfectly good whale?

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sittingbourne, Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MinaHarker View Post
    And haven't we heard somewhere before about the Doctor himself being a massive paradox?
    If I recall correctly he did describe himself as a 'complex space-time event' or somesuch thing in Flesh and Stone, as he proposed using himself to seal the crack which was eventually sealed by the Angels falling into it.

    The Angels are a scary concept, diluted by Moffatt's insistence on rewriting their nature every time they appear. They're ancient aliens who freeze to stone when they are seen as a consequence of their biology. Or they freeze because they instinctively do it when they assume they can be seen. Or they can take over statues (including one huge hollow one made of copper). I suppose they're his own creations so he's free to re-write them as much as he wants, but it gets a bit much when they change in every episode. Still, you'd have to agree that the central idea that they can't move when you can see them but are really unbelievably fast when you can't is damn scary!

    Don't turn your back, don't look away, and DON'T blink!

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sittingbourne, Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Curnow View Post
    surely the answer is he can't now go along and see them because he's read Amy's Afterword, which is clearly written by an Amy who never saw him again after that day. So it's fixed.

    Just a thought.
    The only problem with that is that he didn't read the afterword until he'd already decided it was fixed, so if he'd kept to his original plan of never reading the last page so the story doesn't have to end...

    Remember the good old days when companions left because they wanted to, or because he had to leave them behind, or because they just plainly and simply died?

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    Or married off!

    It would have been really refreshing and traditional if Amy had suddenly just decided to marry that American bloke from the start and off she went.

    Si.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Walsall, West Midlands, UK
    Posts
    4,662

    Default

    I don't recall any past companions committing bigamy though.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    As far as we know. When Vicki got marooned in Greece I bet she had a cockatoo.

    Si.

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Walsall, West Midlands, UK
    Posts
    4,662

    Default

    Maybe, I reckon that Dodo was probably committing polygamy throughout space and time. It's always the quiet ones.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Loughton
    Posts
    11,582

    Default

    I'd heard rumours involving a couple of Monoids...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    If I recall correctly he did describe himself as a 'complex space-time event' or somesuch thing in Flesh and Stone, as he proposed using himself to seal the crack which was eventually sealed by the Angels falling into it.
    A sort-of law of physics unto himself...

  14. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Si Hunt View Post
    So what actually was the Liberty Angel?
    A stupid idea?

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Airstrip One
    Posts
    4,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Curnow View Post
    ...surely the answer is he can't now go along and see them because he's read Amy's Afterword, which is clearly written by an Amy who never saw him again after that day. So it's fixed.
    Shame Amy didn't ask the Doctor to tell little Amelia 'never, ever go to New York, under ANY circumstances' among the other things she asked him....

    Any takers for answering the two questions I posted in my previous post?
    “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    6,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Vale View Post

    Any takers for answering the two questions I posted in my previous post?
    " Use your imagination " (c) Supporters of NuHoo Writers

    (can't answer myself - haven't watched it yet )
    Bazinga !

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    4,996

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Masters View Post
    " Use your imagination " (c) Supporters of NuHoo Writers
    The writers' fun euphemism for "I couldn't be bothered to come up with a good explanation for it in my script"

    Watchers in the Fourth Dimension: A Doctor Who Podcast
    Three Americans and a Brit attempt to watch their way through the entirety of Doctor Who
    ----
    Latest Episode: The WOTAN Clan, discussing The War Machines
    Available on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, and Podbean
    Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @watchers4d

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Valhalla.
    Posts
    15,910

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nyder View Post
    I saw Amy blink during her final stand-off with the angel in the graveyard.
    You did, but the Doctor & River were watching the angel as well.
    The real problem was how did the Angel touch Amy while blocking the Doctor's view whilst River could still see it?

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Walsall, West Midlands, UK
    Posts
    4,662

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirk Gently View Post
    You did, but the Doctor & River were watching the angel as well.
    The real problem was how did the Angel touch Amy while blocking the Doctor's view whilst River could still see it?
    The Angel's touch is still deadly even when it's quantum locked. Amy touched the angel after saying goodbye having chosen to send herself back in time.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    Wait, since when? The Angels are harmless when they are quantum locked, because they turn to stone.

    Si.

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    4,996

    Default

    Yay for more inconsistencies!

    Watchers in the Fourth Dimension: A Doctor Who Podcast
    Three Americans and a Brit attempt to watch their way through the entirety of Doctor Who
    ----
    Latest Episode: The WOTAN Clan, discussing The War Machines
    Available on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, and Podbean
    Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @watchers4d

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    It's all just bollocks really isn't it.

    Si.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Loughton
    Posts
    11,582

    Default

    Don't tempt me to answer in the affirmative!

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bracknell, Berks
    Posts
    29,744

    Default

    I've been trying to tell you all this since the Angels first appeared, but you wouldn't listen to me!

    I've just got my handcuffs and my truncheon and that's enough.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth
    Posts
    25,127

    Default

    It wasn't bollocks then, it all made sense. It's just since then he keeps changing the rules.

    Si.

Similar Threads

  1. Unbound 7: A Storm of Angels
    By Anthony Williams in forum Big Finish and BBC Audios
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 5th Apr 2013, 10:55 PM
  2. Weeping Angels Question
    By Martin Curnow in forum The New Series
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 22nd Sep 2010, 12:42 PM
  3. Rate and Discuss: The Time of Angels
    By SiHart in forum The New Series
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 8th Jul 2010, 8:42 AM
  4. Rate And Discuss 3.7: 42
    By Pip Madeley in forum The New Series
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 9th Jun 2007, 3:01 PM
  5. Rate And Discuss 3.4: Daleks In Manhattan
    By Pip Madeley in forum The New Series
    Replies: 138
    Last Post: 28th Apr 2007, 6:27 PM