Thread: Virgin V Sky

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    17,652

    Default Virgin V Sky

    It's clash of the titans (as covered weeks ago in Lissa's Vervoid blog).

    From The Register:

    Virgin Media isn't going to take Sky's withdrawal of its basic channels lying down, and has threatened legal action for abuse of a dominant position if Sky doesn't agree to independent arbitration within 30 days.

    Virgin pays Sky to carry Sky's channels on its cable network, but Sky also carries Virgin's channels (including Living and Bravo) on its satellite network. It is how Sky compares the value of those channels from which a legal case could be built.

    No one is suggesting Bravo is worth the same as Sky One, but Virgin does claim that viewing figures for Sky's channels are falling, while the numbers watching its own channels continue to rise.

    Over the last three years, Virgin's figures show a 20 per cent drop in the number of homes with Virgin Media (cable) tuned to Sky channels, while reckoning that the number of Sky (satellite) homes tuned to Virgin channels increased 15 per cent in the same period.

    Despite this, Virgin says Sky is asking for more money, while paying less - doubling the former while cutting the latter by 85 per cent, and Virgin claims this is unfair.

    Should the matter end up in court we'll be treated to the amusing sight of Sky claiming that Sky One isn't an important channel, and it'll be quick to point out the success Virgin has had getting rights for on-demand delivery of programmes.

    It could be that this is just sabre rattling, and a further attempt to portray Virgin as the plucky little-guy being bullied by the bigger corporation - something Virgin has done successfully many times. But in reality this is a competition between two large global companies, and this threat is far from the last act in the developing drama.
    So who are you siding with? Surely Virgin/NTL subscribers aren't going to miss Sky, they must have seen every episode of The Simpsons by now. Lost has lost popularity and Heroes is on the Sci-Fi channel anyway. It all sounds like handbags at 50 paces to me.
    Pity. I have no understanding of the word. It is not registered in my vocabulary bank. EXTERMINATE!

  2. #2
    Trudi G Guest

    Default

    This has affected us, and i don't know what to do really. We got cable so we could watch Sky One, because my little boy loves The Simpsons, Futurama and Brainiac.
    Having said that, we have been finding other things to watch....so meh..

  3. #3
    Captain Tancredi Guest

    Default

    I didn't have a choice between the two because NTL wouldn't run their cable the extra couple of miles to reach us. And having had a long-running complaint with them last year which took about six months to resolve because of their general incompetence, if I can possibly avoid that bunch of shysters again in this life I will.

Similar Threads

  1. Virgin Galactic!
    By SiHart in forum News and Sport
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 22nd Oct 2010, 3:14 PM
  2. 11th Dr Novels vs classic BBC & Virgin novels...
    By MacNimon in forum The Fiction Factory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23rd Aug 2010, 6:52 AM
  3. Virgin 1 launches on Freeview
    By Darren in forum Film and Television
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd Sep 2007, 1:52 PM